Toy Store Worker Pleads Not Guilty to Shariah Cross-Dressing Charges in Terengganu

A 33-year-old male sales assistant at a toy store in Kuala Terengganu has pleaded not guilty to charges of cross-dressing and behaving like a woman un...

admin

— 2 min read
Toy Store Worker Pleads Not Guilty to Shariah Cross-Dressing Charges in Terengganu
A 33-year-old male sales assistant at a toy store in Kuala Terengganu has pleaded not guilty to charges of cross-dressing and behaving like a woman under Shariah law, in a case that has drawn attention to the enforcement of Islamic legal provisions in Malaysia. Mohd Lukman Mohamad Aluddin entered his plea at the Syariah High Court on January 14, following charges read before Syariah Judge Hamidi Shafie. The charges stem from an incident alleged to have occurred on May 12 at the KTCC shopping centre, where Mohd Lukman is accused of wearing women's clothing and adopting feminine mannerisms. The case is being prosecuted under Section 33 of the Syariah Criminal Offences (Takzir) Enactment (Terengganu) 2001, a state law that governs certain moral and religious offences for Muslims in the region. Under this enactment, the penalties for such offences can be severe. If convicted, Mohd Lukman faces a fine ranging from RM1,000 to RM3,000, imprisonment of up to two years, or both. In the event of a repeat offence, the consequences escalate to include up to six lashes, imprisonment of up to three years, or both, along with a fine of up to RM5,000. These provisions highlight the strict adherence to Shariah principles in Terengganu, where Islamic law is applied alongside civil statutes for Muslim residents. The court has granted Mohd Lukman bail set at RM3,000, requiring two sureties to secure his release pending trial. The case is scheduled for mention on February 10, when further proceedings will be outlined. This development follows a pattern of similar cases in Malaysia, where Shariah courts handle offences related to personal conduct for Muslims, often sparking debates on human rights and religious freedom. Malaysia operates under a dual legal system, with Shariah courts having jurisdiction over Muslims in matters of family law and certain criminal offences, as defined by state enactments. Terengganu, being a conservative state with a predominantly Muslim population, enforces such laws rigorously. The Syariah Criminal Offences Enactment in Terengganu includes provisions against acts deemed contrary to Islamic teachings, such as cross-dressing, which is often interpreted as violating norms on gender expression. This case raises important questions about the intersection of religious law and individual rights in a multicultural society. While Shariah law is intended to uphold Islamic values, critics argue that it can infringe on personal freedoms and discriminate against minority groups, including the LGBTQ+ community. In recent years, there have been calls for reform to align such laws with international human rights standards, though progress has been slow in more conservative regions like Terengganu. Mohd Lukman's plea of not guilty suggests a potential legal defense, which may involve challenging the evidence or interpretation of the law. Legal experts note that Shariah cases often hinge on the specifics of the alleged behaviour and the context in which it occurred. The outcome could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, influencing both legal practice and social attitudes in the region. As the case proceeds, it will be closely watched by human rights organizations, legal scholars, and the public. The enforcement of Shariah laws in Malaysia continues to be a contentious issue, balancing religious obligations with modern societal values. For now, Mohd Lukman awaits the next steps in a legal process that underscores the complex dynamics of law and morality in contemporary Malaysia.

Read more